EPA announces $1.4 million settlement over alleged chemical accident prevention violations

[USA] The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently finalised a settlement with Sasol Chemicals (Sasol) over alleged violations of the chemical accident prevention provisions of the Clean Air Act at the company’s facility in Westlake, Louisiana.

Under the settlement, Sasol will pay more than $1.4 million in civil penalties and correct violations related to an October 2022 fire at the facility, as well as those found during a compliance evaluation in 2021.

From January through July 2021, EPA conducted a Virtual Partial Compliance Evaluation (VPCE) of the Sasol facility under chemical accident prevention requirements of the Clean Air Act, including Section 112(r) and the General Duty Clause. On October 15, 2022, during the process to settle alleged violations found during the evaluation, a fire occurred at Sasol that resulted in a shelter-in-place order for the Westlake area. The settlement announced addresses violations from the evaluation and the fire.

Under the settlement, Sasol will pay a civil penalty of $1,441,712.00. Sasol will also undertake several actions to resolve alleged violations, such as improving systems and procedures to assure timely completion of the Process Hazardous Analysis recommendations, improving inspections and procedures to maintain mechanical integrity of process equipment, addressing and resolving overdue compliance audits findings, improving safety systems designed to detect potential hazards, updating written and operating procedures to ensure the safe conducting of work activities, and improving implementation practices of operating procedures at the facility.

The injunctive relief in the settlement aligns with new amendments to the Risk Management Program announced on 1 March 2024, that require stronger measures for prevention, preparedness, and public transparency.

The “Safer Communities by Chemical Accident Prevention Rule” protects the health and safety of all communities by requiring industry to prevent accidental releases of dangerous chemicals that could cause deaths and injuries, damage property and the environment, or require surrounding communities to evacuate or shelter-in-place. The rule requires regulated facilities to perform a “safer technologies and alternatives” analysis, and in some cases, facilities will be required to implement reliable safeguard measures.

Under this settlement, Sasol will develop and implement safe work practices for the pressure testing of related process equipment to avoid further chemical accidental releases like the fire and shelter-in-place that occurred on 15 October 2022.

United States Environmental Protection Agency

This is valid as of the 16th April 2024.

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

Managing health and safety legislation across international sites: tackling the challenges

Keeping on top of legislation in the UK is already a laborious task, but when you also manage multiple international sites, it becomes significantly more challenging.

This post dissects our webinar on Managing Health & Safety Regulations Across International Sites which saw Kate Field, Global Head of Health, Safety & Well-Being at BSI, explore this complex responsibility.

It also offers advice on how to navigate constantly changing regulatory landscapes in different countries.

📺 You can watch this webinar on demand here.

What auditors look for

Auditors look for what processes have been established or implemented in relation to:

•   Having access to up-to-date legal requirements and other relevant requirements

•   Methods of establishing how legal requirements and other requirements apply to the organisations

•   What has the client maintained and retained as documented information, such as:

—   Legal register or library

—   Online platform

—   Occupational Health

—   Statutory records

—   Training records

 

Problems that can occur with compliance include:

•   Other requirements are quite often missed

•   Approaches used tend to be overly complicated

•   It is challenging to find evidence of what has been considered, deemed not applicable and why

•   Evaluation of compliance tends to be a one-stop shop as part of the internal audits

•   Knowledge and understanding of compliance status tends to only be with the “specialists” rather than with those responsible for the operating areas

•   There is no one-size-fits-all approach, but there are areas of best practice.

Compliance tips for international sites

In our webinar, Kate provided several insights into the task of compliance with international sites. These included:

•   It is not one size fits all

•   You should be aiming for a ‘Goldilocks’ solution for your organisation, which involves tailored controls suiting organisational needs and risk and how this will work day-to-day at your organisation, not just at audit

•   Look at compliance, not just information – how it is embedded, operational knowledge and evidence

•   It is a team sport!

Colleagues from across the world on a video call discussing informationKate advocated for using international standards, such as ISO 45001 for safety or 14001 for environment, as a consolidation mechanism. As globally recognised frameworks, these standards outline consistent processes for navigating health, safety, and environmental systems.

Certification in international guidelines does not guarantee blanket legislative compliance, but BSI data indicates that over 75% of certified clients find applying ISO standards significantly strengthens conformity, given their focus on continually identifying and integrating relevant requirements.

Why identifying international legislation relevant to your site can be difficult

Operating internationally is a significant and complex process as regulatory landscapes in each country are continually changing. Businesses operating across several locations can often struggle to:

•   Stay on top of ever-changing legislation

•   Understand the legal requirements for each country

•   Compare laws in different countries

•   Create and maintain legal registers

•   Be an expert in that country’s legislation, without having a consultant in that country

 

Requirements can stem from additional sources alongside country-specific legislation, including:

•   Regional directives, specific country-level statutes, and state-based amendments

•   Contracts with health and safety service providers or contractors

•   Import/export regulations on machinery, chemicals, or hazardous materials

•   Protection for staff travelling internationally against legal risks overseas

 

Alongside the difficulties with complex regulatory systems, and keeping on top of updates, different jurisdictions can hold different views on whether non-compliance results in civil or criminal proceedings, which can have a significant impact on potential punishments. Enforcement regimes can vary significantly, and local input is required to ensure compliance.

All this knowledge is difficult enough to source initially, and close monitoring is required to keep this information and expertise up to date. This can be difficult when you have multiple sites in multiple countries, and in countries where these documents may not be available in English, so translation services are required.

How does the Barbour International service help you with managing compliance across international sites?

The Barbour Comprehensive International Module will support you and your organisation with its health, safety and environmental responsibilities. We have done the hard work to help you to:

 Quickly understand your environment, health and safety responsibilities for a variety of countries

 Keep up to date with existing and upcoming legislation and guidance

 Create and maintain your legal registers with alerts when anything changes

 

Our International Module supports you with:

•   Country guides: your ultimate resource for understanding health, safety and environment within each country.

•   Topic guidance: we provide granular and detailed guidance on your areas of responsibility, helping you to instantly see how the law stands in each country.

•   Upcoming legislation and consultation diary: easily see which consultations are currently in place and what legislation is on the horizon.

•   Easy-to-use legal register facility: bookmark your key pieces of legislation to build your own compliance register. We send you email alerts when anything changes.

•   Weekly international briefings: a round-up of prosecutions, news, guidance, reports, legislation, and consultations to keep you informed on important EHS for a country.

•   Original legislation and guidance documents: our searchable library contains legislation and guidance as originally published, and information is categorised by topic.

 

Our country guides include:

•   Relevant types of law

•   Compliance

•   Enforcement

•   Inspection

•   Key organisations

Alongside our International module, we also have a comprehensive eLearning service. Our courses can be translated into any language, helping to ensure standardised and consistent training for all learners in your organisation — wherever they are in the world.

Why not take a look and see how our International service can support you?

We’d love to show you around! Simply fill out this form and we’ll be in touch to organise a 30-minute high-level overview of these services.

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

Barbour EHS and the SRC family sold to Inflexion

As you may know, Barbour EHS is a part of Marlowe Software, Risk and Compliance. We work closely with our sister companies, Elogs and William Martin, enabling clients to enhance visibility, increase productivity and reduce risk.

On 22nd February 2024, Marlowe plc reached agreement to sell our brands to Inflexion, a leading investment firm. A transaction is expected to complete following regulatory approval over the next two months.

Inflexion’s backing will help us continue to grow and develop our leading software platforms and people-led services that you’re used to.

What does that mean today?

There will be no change in our relationship with you. It’s business as usual, and we’ll continue to provide you with the same excellent service you have come to expect. There will be no changes to our people, our organisation or our leadership team.

What does it mean for the future?

Over the last two years, we’ve made huge progress with the integration of our brands and products to create a truly unique compliance ecosystem. With Inflexion’s backing, this will only get better. Stay tuned for further updates.

✉️ If you have any questions, feel free to drop an email to enquiries@barbour-ehs.com.

As you may know, Barbour EHS is a part of Marlowe Software, Risk and Compliance. We work closely with our sister companies, Elogs and William Martin, enabling clients to enhance visibility, increase productivity and reduce risk.

On 22nd February 2024, Marlowe plc reached agreement to sell our brands to Inflexion, a leading investment firm. A transaction is expected to complete following regulatory approval over the next two months.

Inflexion’s backing will help us continue to grow and develop our leading software platforms and people-led services that you’re used to.

What does that mean today?

There will be no change in our relationship with you. It’s business as usual, and we’ll continue to provide you with the same excellent service you have come to expect. There will be no changes to our people, our organisation or our leadership team.

What does it mean for the future?

Over the last two years, we’ve made huge progress with the integration of our brands and products to create a truly unique compliance ecosystem. With Inflexion’s backing, this will only get better. Stay tuned for further updates.

✉️ If you have any questions, feel free to drop an email to enquiries@barbour-ehs.com.

Company prosecuted for breaching F-Gas regulations

Buy It Direct (BID), the holding company for Appliances Direct, has been fined £37,500 following legal action taken by the Environment Agency for breaching F-Gas Regulations.

Acting on information provided by F-Gas certification scheme REFCOM, in 2020, the online sales company was found to be in breach of F-GAS Regulation Article 11 Paragraph 5, which seeks to ensure that non-hermetically sealed equipment charged with fluorinated greenhouse gases shall only be sold to an end user whereby installation is to be carried out by someone holding a valid F-Gas handling certificate or F-Gas registered contractor.

According to the Building Engineering Services Association (BESA), which operates REFCOM, BID chief executive Nick Glynne had argued in the company’s defence that purchasers “could not proceed to actual purchase without agreeing contractual terms which included installation by a relevant qualified engineer.”

Prosecutors dismissed these claims because there was “no evidence that the installation will be properly carried out,” and the judgement found that 94% of Appliances Direct’s sales to end users lacked evidence indicating compliance with regulations.

Graeme Fox, technical director at BESA, said: “This is a landmark prosecution that sets a precedent for anyone trying to circumvent these important public safety regulations using online sales platforms. REFCOM and its members have been raising the alarm about online sellers for several years as they represent a vulnerability in the system that can lead to equipment falling into the wrong hands. Most distributors and wholesalers are fully aware of their responsibilities and ensure they receive confirmation of safe installation before selling refrigeration and air conditioning equipment, but we remain vigilant for any that might seek to act irresponsibly for profit.

“We will continue to work hard on behalf of the industry and its customers to ensure only properly trained, qualified and registered individuals and companies carry out this important work.”

This is valid as of 16th January 2024.

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

Former Nottingham bank worker wins £900,000 payout after cancer caused by exposure to asbestos

A former Nottingham bank worker diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to asbestos more than 40 years ago has been awarded £900,000 compensation from HSBC. The 57-year-old was a junior clerk at the Midland Bank in Alfreton Road in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

She only discovered that she had asbestos-linked mesothelioma when she underwent a chest X-ray following a car crash in 2018. Due to the aggressive nature of the illness, doctors warned that her health could deteriorate quickly, giving her a life expectancy of three to 21 months.

The Beeston woman, who was just 16 when she worked at the bank, later became a qualified academic but was forced to give up work after the diagnosis to undergo life-extending treatment. The case was settled out of court.

The bank has accepted full liability and agreed to a £900,000 payout to reflect her “significant loss of earnings” and to help fund “vital therapies, treatments, and ongoing care needs.”

A lawyer for the team representing the former worker said: “Sadly, there are many people like this who were working in clerical roles in banks and other offices environments that were completely unaware of the presence of asbestos, and the potential harm that it can cause.

“In this case, the employer had been responsible for protecting workers from exposure, yet it failed to take any action to provide protective equipment or to remove the dangerous dust.”

This is valid as of 15th January 2024.

A former Nottingham bank worker diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to asbestos more than 40 years ago has been awarded £900,000 compensation from HSBC. The 57-year-old was a junior clerk at the Midland Bank in Alfreton Road in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

She only discovered that she had asbestos-linked mesothelioma when she underwent a chest X-ray following a car crash in 2018. Due to the aggressive nature of the illness, doctors warned that her health could deteriorate quickly, giving her a life expectancy of three to 21 months.

The Beeston woman, who was just 16 when she worked at the bank, later became a qualified academic but was forced to give up work after the diagnosis to undergo life-extending treatment. The case was settled out of court.

The bank has accepted full liability and agreed to a £900,000 payout to reflect her “significant loss of earnings” and to help fund “vital therapies, treatments, and ongoing care needs.”

A lawyer for the team representing the former worker said: “Sadly, there are many people like this who were working in clerical roles in banks and other offices environments that were completely unaware of the presence of asbestos, and the potential harm that it can cause.

“In this case, the employer had been responsible for protecting workers from exposure, yet it failed to take any action to provide protective equipment or to remove the dangerous dust.”

This is valid as of 15th January 2024.

Company fined after worker spotted on pallet raised by forklift truck

A company has been fined after shocked onlookers spotted an employee precariously working from height while standing on a pallet raised by a forklift truck at Ramsgate Harbour.

The HSE prosecuted European Active Projects (EAP) Limited for breaching Work at Height Regulations after one of its workers was spotted on the pallet on 8 July 2022. The workplace regulator was alerted to the activity after it was reported by a member of the public, who managed to capture the terrifying debacle on video.

The worker was part of a team of three at EAP Limited that were removing work equipment from the deck of a boat in the harbour’s slipway.

As scaffolding had been removed, the workers raised a pallet to the deck with a forklift truck and used it as a mobile platform to remove items from the boat.

One of the workers was then witnessed climbing from the side of the vessel, beneath the guard rails, and onto the pallet with a heavy, motorised pressure washer. The pressure washer was then lowered to the ground.

The HSE investigation found EAP Limited had failed to plan the work at height associated with the refurbishments and repair work being completed on the boat, leaving workers at risk, with no safe method for removing equipment located on the vessel’s deck.

European Active Projects Limited, of Chatham Docks, Gillingham Gate, Chatham, Kent, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 4(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005. The company was fined £100,000 and ordered to pay £5,730.40 in costs.

HSE inspector Samuel Brown said: “This incident demonstrates why there is a need to appropriately plan and supervise work at height. Clearly, lessons had not been learnt since the company’s previous prosecution in 2015.

“Falls from height are still the biggest cause of fatal accidents involving workers.

“The risk of workers falling from the pallet and sustaining serious, possibly fatal, injuries should not be ignored. Fortunately, no workers were harmed and the reporting of the incident by a concerned member of public enabled HSE to intervene and prevent any further unsafe work at height on site.”

This HSE prosecution was brought by HSE senior enforcement lawyer Nathan Cook and supported by HSE paralegal officer Cristina Alcov.

This is valid as of 12th January 2024.

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

Pathway for zero emission vehicle transition by 2035 becomes law

The UK Government says that the UK now has the most ambitious regulatory framework for the switch to electric vehicles of any country in the world, thanks to new laws which commenced as of 3 January 2024.

The zero emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate sets out the percentage of new zero emission cars and vans manufacturers will be required to produce each year up to 2030. It states that 80% of new cars and 70% of new vans sold in Great Britain will now be zero emission by 2030, increasing to 100% by 2035.

Technology and Decarbonisation Minister Anthony Browne said: “Alongside us having spent more than £2 billion in the transition to electric vehicles, our zero emission vehicle mandate will further boost the economy and support manufacturers to safeguard skilled British jobs in the automotive industry.

“We are providing investment certainty for the charging sector to expand our charging network which has already grown by 44% since this time last year. This will support the constantly growing number of EVs in the UK, which currently account for over 16% of the new UK car market.”

The new laws are also intended to help households make the switch to electric, supporting growth of EV sales in the second-hand market, and incentivising charging to roll out more widely across the country.

The government’s schemes to lower the upfront and running costs of owning an EV includes the plug-in van grant of up to £2,500 for small vans and £5,000 for large vans until at least 2025 and £350 off the cost of homeplace chargepoints for people living in flats.

Additionally, last month the UK and European Union (EU) agreed to extend trade rules on electric vehicles, saving manufacturers and consumers up to an estimated £4.3 billion in additional costs.

The government also says it is continuing to support the rollout of EV infrastructure, with applications for the first round of the £381 million Local EV Infrastructure Fund currently being assessed. The government has also launched a £70 million pilot to support the deployment of ultra-rapid charging points at motorway service areas.

As part of the government’s “Plan for drivers,” it says it also intends to consult on ways to make installations cheaper and quicker for chargepoint operators, review the grid connections process for chargepoints, and consult on the expansion of permitted development rights to make installations easier.

This is valid as of 8th January 2024.

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

Fine after fall from height leaves stunt performer with life-changing injuries

A production company has been fined after a stunt performer was injured during the filming of Fast and Furious 9: The Fast Saga.

Joe Watts, from Surrey, sustained life-changing injuries after he fell approximately 25 feet at Warner Bros. studios in Leavesden, Hertfordshire on 22 July 2019.

He had been filming a fight scene for the action movie.

Mr Watts fell 25 feet onto the concrete floor below when the line on his stunt vest became detached.

As a result of his fall, Mr Watts suffered a fractured skull and a severe traumatic brain injury, which has resulted in permanent impairment and disability.

The HSE’s investigation found several failings by FF9 Pictures Limited:

•   FF9 Pictures Limited’s risk assessment failed to address the potential issue of a rope snap or a link failure.

•   There was no system for double checking that the link had been properly engaged and tightened.

•   There was no system for checking the link for signs of deformation or stretching between takes, the manufacturer’s website stated that the link used was forbidden for use as PPE and shock loading should be avoided.

•   Six-monthly inspections of harnesses were required but Mr Watts’ harness had not been inspected in the last six months.

•   FF9 Pictures Limited did not extend the crash matting needed to mitigate the consequences of an unintended fall following changes to the set and the sequence of the stunt.

FF9 Pictures Limited, of St. Giles High Street, London, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The company was fined £800,000 and ordered to pay £14,752.85 in costs.

HSE inspector Roxanne Barker said: “Mr Watts’ injuries were life-changing and he could have easily been killed. In stunt work, it is not about preventing a fall but minimising the risk of an injury.”

This prosecution was brought by HSE enforcement lawyer Rebecca Schwartz and supported by HSE paralegal officer Gabrielle O’Sullivan.

Sentencing, district judge Talwinder Buttar stated Mr Watts is fortunate to be alive and added that she was astonished that the crash matting was not adequate.

This is valid as of 6th December 2023.

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

Massive fine for two mining companies following fatal accident

(Canada) Two mining companies have been fined a combined $430,000 following a fatal workplace incident at the Lac des Iles Mine in Northwestern Ontario.

Impala Canada Ltd. was fined $300,000 and SCR Mines Technology (2013) Inc. was fined $130,000 after both companies pleaded guilty to failing to conduct an appropriate risk assessment.

The incident happened on 27 May 2020, when a worker was overwhelmed by blasted ore saturated with concrete and water that breached protective barriers at the base of a mining shaft used for ore and mining waste transfer.

A series of events led up to the incident. Impala Canada Ltd. had identified deterioration in an ore pass, a vertical underground opening used for ore transportation within the mine. The company hired SCR Mines Technology to repair the ore pass. SCR’s rehabilitation process involved scaling the walls, installing ground support, and shotcreting the ore pass walls in six-foot vertical sections.

The tragedy occurred during the repair work when an unusual amount of shotcrete rebounded off the walls, and water collected on top of the muck. On the day of the accident, SCR initiated a muck drawdown, during which an SCR worker entered the loading pocket platform to remove lockout locks to evacuate additional muck. Unfortunately, the flow of muck was not controlled by the guillotine gate, causing the muck, saturated with shotcrete, to overwhelm the protective barriers and fatally injure the worker.

It was also revealed the Lac Des Iles Mine had an underground water management plan in place, but it did not include procedures to guard against the addition and accumulation of water in ore passes during repair activities.

Both companies failed to conduct a risk assessment that considered the location and placement of personnel during muck drawdown activities, which could pose a danger to workers. This failure violated section 25(1)(c) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Canadian Occupational Safety | This is valid as of 29th November 2023.

(Canada) Two mining companies have been fined a combined $430,000 following a fatal workplace incident at the Lac des Iles Mine in Northwestern Ontario.

Impala Canada Ltd. was fined $300,000 and SCR Mines Technology (2013) Inc. was fined $130,000 after both companies pleaded guilty to failing to conduct an appropriate risk assessment.

The incident happened on 27 May 2020, when a worker was overwhelmed by blasted ore saturated with concrete and water that breached protective barriers at the base of a mining shaft used for ore and mining waste transfer.

A series of events led up to the incident. Impala Canada Ltd. had identified deterioration in an ore pass, a vertical underground opening used for ore transportation within the mine. The company hired SCR Mines Technology to repair the ore pass. SCR’s rehabilitation process involved scaling the walls, installing ground support, and shotcreting the ore pass walls in six-foot vertical sections.

The tragedy occurred during the repair work when an unusual amount of shotcrete rebounded off the walls, and water collected on top of the muck. On the day of the accident, SCR initiated a muck drawdown, during which an SCR worker entered the loading pocket platform to remove lockout locks to evacuate additional muck. Unfortunately, the flow of muck was not controlled by the guillotine gate, causing the muck, saturated with shotcrete, to overwhelm the protective barriers and fatally injure the worker.

It was also revealed the Lac Des Iles Mine had an underground water management plan in place, but it did not include procedures to guard against the addition and accumulation of water in ore passes during repair activities.

Both companies failed to conduct a risk assessment that considered the location and placement of personnel during muck drawdown activities, which could pose a danger to workers. This failure violated section 25(1)(c) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Canadian Occupational Safety | This is valid as of 29th November 2023.

Landlord prosecuted over multiple fire and safety risks

A landlord and a property management company were found guilty earlier this month of putting tenants at risk, following a council investigation and prosecution.

Officers at the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea made a dawn raid at the 22-bedroom house of multiple occupation (HMO) in Hyde Park Gate in 2021, where they found multiple fire and damp risks.

Following a complaint from a tenant back in 2020, the Council begun an investigation which would uncover the landlord was unlicensed to operate the 22-bedroom house-share style property. Despite repeated warnings, the landlord did not apply for a licence and the Council eventually visited with the Met Police and London Fire Brigade.

Officers found:

•   Defective and damaged fire doors.

•   Inadequate fire separation between bedrooms and protection in the boiler room or lobby.

•   Covered fire alarms.

•   Burnt out and loose electrical sockets.

Tenants were also cooking in their room using camping-style facilities without proper kitchen facilities. There was rising damp and mould growth throughout the property and single glazed windows with rotten frames, draughts and broken sashes. The inside of the property was so damp that mushrooms were growing in upper floors.

Blackstone Properties Management Limited and director of the company, Mr Mohamed Ali Rasool, were fined a total of £480,000 plus costs at Westminster Magistrate Court earlier this month.

Cllr Cem Kemahli, lead member for planning and public realm, said: “Let this judgement be a clear lesson to other landlords and agents – if you are offering poor quality accommodation we will find you and we will come after you.

“We want the best homes in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. Our landlord licensing schemes are seeking out the bad operators to ensure safer homes for everyone and a fairer market for good operators.

“Privately rented homes form a crucial part of our housing mix but they must be up to scratch. Our teams stand by to help and assist landlords in answering concerns or offering suggestions about how to improve your properties.”

This is valid as of 27th November 2023.

Sign-up to the Barbour Monthly Newsletter

Get the latest Health, Safety and Environmental news and information – sign up for updates from Barbour EHS. Computer monitor What you’ll get:
  • Free downloads including Directors’ Briefings, legislation updates, webinars, risk assessments and more
  • VIP invites to events
  • Important industry news and updates
  • Invitations to hot topic webinars hosted by Barbour
  • Industry partner information

Record $2.1 million fine over apprentice’s serious head injury

[Australia] An industrial component manufacturer and its director have been convicted and fined a total of $2.24 million and the director placed on a five-year Community Corrections Order after an apprentice was seriously injured in Gippsland.

An industrial component manufacturer and its director have been convicted and fined a total of $2.24 million and the director placed on a five-year Community Corrections Order after an apprentice was seriously injured in Gippsland.

Dennis Jones Engineering Pty Ltd and sole director Dennis Jones were sentenced in the Melbourne County Court after earlier pleading guilty to a single charge each under the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

The company was convicted and fined a record $2.1 million for recklessly engaging in conduct that placed a person in danger of serious injury.

Jones was convicted and fined $140,000 for failing to provide or maintain safe systems of work by failing to take reasonable care as an officer of the company. He was also ordered to complete a Community Corrections Order of five years duration with a condition to complete 600 hours of unpaid community work.

In October 2021, Jones directed the 20-year-old apprentice to use a plastic sleeve to steady lengths of steel pipe that he was threading on a lathe at the company’s Morwell workshop.

The apprentice was holding the plastic sleeve on the end of a pipe that protruded nearly 1.5 metres from the rear spindle of the lathe and was struck when the pipe bent and whipped. He was placed in an induced coma, airlifted to hospital, and underwent surgery for serious head injuries.

A WorkSafe investigation found Jones should have been aware of the risk and that it was reasonably practicable to ensure that covers were fixed to the lathe to prevent pipes that protruded from being threaded, or that a fixed steady was used to support such pipes and an exclusion zone used to restrict access to the danger area near the pipe.

WorkSafe Executive Director of Health and Safety Narelle Beer said overhanging work pieces were a well-known safety risk when using lathes: “It is incredibly frustrating that this employer had several control measures to eliminate or reduce the risk available but simply chose not to use them.

“The significant penalties for this company and director reflect the life-altering impact this devastating incident has had on a vulnerable apprentice who was at the very start of his career.”

This is valid as of 21st November 2023.

[Australia] An industrial component manufacturer and its director have been convicted and fined a total of $2.24 million and the director placed on a five-year Community Corrections Order after an apprentice was seriously injured in Gippsland.

An industrial component manufacturer and its director have been convicted and fined a total of $2.24 million and the director placed on a five-year Community Corrections Order after an apprentice was seriously injured in Gippsland.

Dennis Jones Engineering Pty Ltd and sole director Dennis Jones were sentenced in the Melbourne County Court after earlier pleading guilty to a single charge each under the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

The company was convicted and fined a record $2.1 million for recklessly engaging in conduct that placed a person in danger of serious injury.

Jones was convicted and fined $140,000 for failing to provide or maintain safe systems of work by failing to take reasonable care as an officer of the company. He was also ordered to complete a Community Corrections Order of five years duration with a condition to complete 600 hours of unpaid community work.

In October 2021, Jones directed the 20-year-old apprentice to use a plastic sleeve to steady lengths of steel pipe that he was threading on a lathe at the company's Morwell workshop.

The apprentice was holding the plastic sleeve on the end of a pipe that protruded nearly 1.5 metres from the rear spindle of the lathe and was struck when the pipe bent and whipped. He was placed in an induced coma, airlifted to hospital, and underwent surgery for serious head injuries.

A WorkSafe investigation found Jones should have been aware of the risk and that it was reasonably practicable to ensure that covers were fixed to the lathe to prevent pipes that protruded from being threaded, or that a fixed steady was used to support such pipes and an exclusion zone used to restrict access to the danger area near the pipe.

WorkSafe Executive Director of Health and Safety Narelle Beer said overhanging work pieces were a well-known safety risk when using lathes: “It is incredibly frustrating that this employer had several control measures to eliminate or reduce the risk available but simply chose not to use them.

“The significant penalties for this company and director reflect the life-altering impact this devastating incident has had on a vulnerable apprentice who was at the very start of his career.”

This is valid as of 21st November 2023.

Brothers receive prison terms and director bans for multiple illegal waste sites

Operators of a quarry near Stevenage have been given prison sentences after storing and burying enough illegal waste to fill the Royal Albert Hall nearly three times over.

The Environment Agency prosecuted former teacher Liam Winters and his brother, Mark Winters, both from Warwickshire, for the unlawful disposal of large quantities of household and business waste at Codicote Quarry, off the A1, for almost three years.

Liam Winters was handed a 17-month prison term by St Albans crown court, while Mark Winters, with links to the Republic of Ireland, was sentenced to 12 months inside, suspended for two years. The court also banned the brothers as company directors for eight years.

Judge Caroline Wigin heard Codicote Quarry had a permit to treat and store a small amount of soil waste but not hold it in huge quantities. The quarry went beyond what was authorised by the Environment Agency.

The suspect material was predominately household, commercial and industrial waste, but also electrical items, car parts, furniture, food packaging, wood and metal. In all, at least 200,000 cubic metres of banned and potentially harmful material.

The men, directors of Codicote Quarry Ltd, showed a flagrant disregard for the law and the effect of their business on the environment.

The illegal disposal means the site will need monitoring for many years to minimise the risk of polluting the River Mimram and groundwater sources as the quarry was not set up for landfill.

Barry Russell, environment manager for the Environment Agency in Hertfordshire, said: “We hope that prison for Liam Winters and a suspended term for Mark Winters sends out a strong message that we will prosecute waste site operators who do not follow the rules for disposal.

“The operation of an illegal waste site without regard for the environment and the law has the potential to harm our natural resources, blight communities and undermine the legitimate businesses who do stick to the law.”

Officers from the Environment Agency questioned the brothers in 2017 about the amount of waste the quarry was holding.

With support from Hertfordshire County Council, countless on-site checks followed to get the operators to comply with the law, but the waste piles grew and began to decompose.

As well as mountains of waste, the pair were also burying it, more than 12 metres deep in places, under a layer of chalk. By November 2017, with the quarry holding so much illegal and contaminated waste, the Environment Agency suspended the site’s permit.

Officers later issued two notices aimed at getting the waste removed, but the men appeared to show no regard for authority and none of it was taken away, as required by the Environment Agency.

Liam Winters’ prison sentence also relates to illegal waste storage at two more locations in Hertfordshire.

The 46-year-old, of High Street, Hillmorton, Rugby, and a third man, Nicholas Bramwell, admitted allowing plastic, wood, metal, packaging, and soil to be buried illegally.

The waste at Anstey Quarry, near Royston, reached 20 metres into the sky, as high as five buses on top of each other, while material at Nuthampstead shooting ground was hidden under a landscaped area.

Bramwell, now 44, of Shepherds Close, Royston, was fined £1,450 in June last year and ordered to pay £8,000 towards the Environment Agency’s costs and a victim surcharge of £120.

Mark Winters, 49, latterly of Oxford Street, Rugby, but living at Bangor Erris in County Mayo when he surrendered, will also have to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work.

At separate hearings in February this year, the brothers admitted four identical charges amounting to allowing or being involved in accepting waste and storing it at Codicote Quarry between January 2015 and November 2017. This was either outside the conditions of the site’s Environment Agency’s permit, or with no permit at all. They were also charged for ignoring the suspension notice to stop operations.

The Environment Agency prosecuted the pair under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016 and the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

At the hearing on 20 October, it was decided that any award of costs or a confiscation order against the men and Codicote Quarry Ltd will be considered at a later date.

This is valid as of 21st November 2023.

Operators of a quarry near Stevenage have been given prison sentences after storing and burying enough illegal waste to fill the Royal Albert Hall nearly three times over.

The Environment Agency prosecuted former teacher Liam Winters and his brother, Mark Winters, both from Warwickshire, for the unlawful disposal of large quantities of household and business waste at Codicote Quarry, off the A1, for almost three years.

Liam Winters was handed a 17-month prison term by St Albans crown court, while Mark Winters, with links to the Republic of Ireland, was sentenced to 12 months inside, suspended for two years. The court also banned the brothers as company directors for eight years.

Judge Caroline Wigin heard Codicote Quarry had a permit to treat and store a small amount of soil waste but not hold it in huge quantities. The quarry went beyond what was authorised by the Environment Agency.

The suspect material was predominately household, commercial and industrial waste, but also electrical items, car parts, furniture, food packaging, wood and metal. In all, at least 200,000 cubic metres of banned and potentially harmful material.

The men, directors of Codicote Quarry Ltd, showed a flagrant disregard for the law and the effect of their business on the environment.

The illegal disposal means the site will need monitoring for many years to minimise the risk of polluting the River Mimram and groundwater sources as the quarry was not set up for landfill.

Barry Russell, environment manager for the Environment Agency in Hertfordshire, said: “We hope that prison for Liam Winters and a suspended term for Mark Winters sends out a strong message that we will prosecute waste site operators who do not follow the rules for disposal.

“The operation of an illegal waste site without regard for the environment and the law has the potential to harm our natural resources, blight communities and undermine the legitimate businesses who do stick to the law.”

Officers from the Environment Agency questioned the brothers in 2017 about the amount of waste the quarry was holding.

With support from Hertfordshire County Council, countless on-site checks followed to get the operators to comply with the law, but the waste piles grew and began to decompose.

As well as mountains of waste, the pair were also burying it, more than 12 metres deep in places, under a layer of chalk. By November 2017, with the quarry holding so much illegal and contaminated waste, the Environment Agency suspended the site’s permit.

Officers later issued two notices aimed at getting the waste removed, but the men appeared to show no regard for authority and none of it was taken away, as required by the Environment Agency.

Liam Winters’ prison sentence also relates to illegal waste storage at two more locations in Hertfordshire.

The 46-year-old, of High Street, Hillmorton, Rugby, and a third man, Nicholas Bramwell, admitted allowing plastic, wood, metal, packaging, and soil to be buried illegally.

The waste at Anstey Quarry, near Royston, reached 20 metres into the sky, as high as five buses on top of each other, while material at Nuthampstead shooting ground was hidden under a landscaped area.

Bramwell, now 44, of Shepherds Close, Royston, was fined £1,450 in June last year and ordered to pay £8,000 towards the Environment Agency’s costs and a victim surcharge of £120.

Mark Winters, 49, latterly of Oxford Street, Rugby, but living at Bangor Erris in County Mayo when he surrendered, will also have to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work.

At separate hearings in February this year, the brothers admitted four identical charges amounting to allowing or being involved in accepting waste and storing it at Codicote Quarry between January 2015 and November 2017. This was either outside the conditions of the site’s Environment Agency’s permit, or with no permit at all. They were also charged for ignoring the suspension notice to stop operations.

The Environment Agency prosecuted the pair under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016 and the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

At the hearing on 20 October, it was decided that any award of costs or a confiscation order against the men and Codicote Quarry Ltd will be considered at a later date.

This is valid as of 21st November 2023.

✉ Sign up to the Barbour Newsletter

Free downloads, advance notice of webinars, product updates and perks – all straight to your inbox.

  • Barbour EHS may from time to time send updates about Barbour products and services. By providing your contact information you consent to being contacted for direct marketing purposes by Barbour EHS. Please ensure you review our Privacy Policy.